One of the challenges posed by Serverless solutions from a Cloud Native viewpoint?

One of the challenges posed by Serverless solutions from a Cloud Native viewpoint?

• A. Vendor lock-in due to lack of standardized APIs
• B. Increased network latency
• C. Requirement to manage servers manually
• D. Guaranteed universal APIs across providers

Answer: (A)

The main challenge is portability across environments. Serverless platforms map a lot of functionality to provider-specific APIs and execution environments, so the way you deploy, configure, and trigger functions is tightly tied to that vendor. Because there isn’t a universal standard for serverless APIs, moving workloads between clouds or adopting a multi-cloud strategy often requires rewriting code or reconfiguring integrations. This vendor lock-in is a key Cloud Native concern, since one goal of Cloud Native practices is to build portable, interoperable systems that aren’t locked to a single provider. While some latency or management aspects can vary, they aren’t the fundamental barrier here, and the idea of universal APIs across providers isn’t the reality—there isn’t a widely adopted standard for serverless APIs.

The main challenge is portability across environments. Serverless platforms map a lot of functionality to provider-specific APIs and execution environments, so the way you deploy, configure, and trigger functions is tightly tied to that vendor. Because there isn’t a universal standard for serverless APIs, moving workloads between clouds or adopting a multi-cloud strategy often requires rewriting code or reconfiguring integrations. This vendor lock-in is a key Cloud Native concern, since one goal of Cloud Native practices is to build portable, interoperable systems that aren’t locked to a single provider. While some latency or management aspects can vary, they aren’t the fundamental barrier here, and the idea of universal APIs across providers isn’t the reality—there isn’t a widely adopted standard for serverless APIs.